2013 NCAA Division III Soccer Championships

The NCAA conducts Division III men's and women's soccer national championships in the form of a single-elimination tournaments.  Most conferences receive a single automatic berth to the men's and women's tournaments which they may award in the manner they see fit, usually to their conference champions determined by a post-season tournament.  The remainder of each tournament's field is made up of at-large selections made by the Division III men's and women's soccer committees following a prescribed set of criteria.  The tournament brackets are set-up in accordance with guidelines aimed at limiting travel and flights while still creating inter-regional match-ups.

All information about the tournament and the determination of participants is found in the 2013 Division III Soccer Pre-Championships Manual.  Much of what follows highlights, summarizes, or quotes the manual.  

Administration

The NCAA championship tournaments are administrated by the eight-member NCAA Division III Men's and Women's Soccer Committees which are each composed of the chairs of their respective regional advisory committees.  These committees make the at-large selections to complete the tournament field, assisted in the evaluation of teams by the Regional Advisory Committees.  These are the same national and regional committees which release the pre-tournament weekly NCAA Regional Rankings.  The members of these committees can be found on pages 8-12 of the Pre-Championships Manual.

Championship Format

The format of the men's and women's championships are single-elimination tournaments. The maximum size of the tournament fields is established by the Division III Championships Committee which currently prescribes an approximate access ratio of 1:6.5 not to exceed 64 participants, as per Article 31.3.1.1 of the 2013-14 NCAA Division III Manual (pg. 218).  The basis for the size of the tournament fields is the number of championship eligible teams, and the men's and women's committees have gained approval for 61- and 64-team tournaments in 2013, as per the Pre-Championships Manual (pg. 16 and 18).  This represents a decrease of one men's team from last year which we believe stems from a miscalculation by the men's committee last year.  Our math for this year, as shown in the following table, yields 61- and 64-team men's and women's tournaments, matching what has been approved.  Our calculation last year also yielded a 61-team field for the men even though a 62-team field was approved and used.  (Note: the calculation of the tournament field size was shown in the manual through the 2011 season, but last year and again this year is not provided).

2013 Tournament Field Sizes


2013 Eligibility / Access Ratio Field Size
Men 398 eligible teams / 6.5 = 61.1 61 teams
Women 427 eligible teams / 6.5 = 65.7 64 teams

For the women, with a 64-team field, there are six rounds with no first round byes.  The men's tournament also has six rounds, however, includes three first round byes.  Except in the case of the men's byes, four-team pods will play first and second round matches at a selected host during the first weekend of the tournament (Fri.-Sat. or Sat.-Sun.).  In the case of the men's byes, pairs of teams will play on Thursday with the winners travelling to play the teams receiving byes on Sunday.  Four-team sectionals will play third and fourth round matches at a selected host on the second weekend of the tournament (Fri.-Sat. or Sat.-Sun.).  The tournaments will be suspended over the Thanksgiving holiday weekend with the both Final Fours occuring the following weekend at a pre-determined joint men's and women's site which for the fifth straight season is Blossom Soccer Complex in San Antonio, Texas.  A third-place game will not be played.

2013 Tournament Format and Dates

4-team First and Second Round Pods* Fri./Sat., Nov. 15-16; or
Sat./Sun., Nov. 16-17
4-team Sectionals
(Third and Fourth Rounds)
Fri./Sat., Nov. 22-23; or
Sat./Sun., Nov. 23-24
Joint Men's and Women's Final Four
(Semifinals and Finals)

Fri./Sat., Dec. 6-7

* - in the case of byes: First Round pairing on Thu., Nov. 14 and Second Round match on Sun., Nov. 17.

Allocation of Berths

Teams eligible for the championship tournament are divided into three pools: Pool A, Pool B, and Pool C, as per Section 2.3 of the D-III Soccer portion of the Pre-Championships Manual (pg. 18).

Classification of championship-eligible teams

  • Pool A - conference selected representative from each conference that meets the requirements for automatic qualification
  • Pool B - independent institutions and institutions that are members of conferences that do not meet the requirements for automatic qualification
  • Pool C - institutions from automatic-qualifying conferences that are not their conference champion and teams not selected from Pool B

Forty-one (41) men's conferences and forty-three (43) women's conferences (see list below) have been granted automatic qualification (AQ) for the 2013 championship tournaments.  AQ is the common short-hand for automatic qualifiers or Pool A berths.  The conferences themselves determine how they award their automatic berth.  Often the AQ spot is awarded to the conference champion, whether determined by regular season finish or by a post-season tournament.  However, some conferences determine their champion by regular season finish and hold a post-season tournament to award the AQ berth.

The other berths from Pool B and C are at-large berths.  The number of at-large Pool B berths is determined by applying an access ratio up to but not to exceed that of Pool A teams.  The Pool A access ratio is the total number of eligible teams in AQ conferences divided by the number of  AQ conferences.  When this ratio is applied to Pool B, the result is traditionally truncated (rounded down to the nearest whole number) to ensure that Pool B access ratio does not exceed that of Pool A.  The number of at-large Pool C berths is simply the number of remaining tournament spots after the Pool A and B berths have been filled. 

According to Section 2.3 of the Division III portion of the Pre-Championships Manual (pg. 18), the tournament berth allocations for 2013 break down as follows for the men's and women's championships (starting last year, the manual does not show the calculation of the number of Pool B berths, but our calculations as shown in the table confirm the given distribution).

2013 Allocation of Berths

Men's Tournament
Pool A No. of Automatic Qualifying Conferences 41 berths
Pool B No. of Pool B teams / Pool A access ratio
18 / (380/41) = 18 / 9.27 = 1.94
1 berth  
Pool C Field size - Pool A berths - Pool B berths
61 - 41 - 1 = 19
19 berths
Women's Tournament
Pool A No. of Automatic Qualifying Conferences 43 berths
Pool B No. of Pool B teams / Pool A access ratio
13 / (414/43) = 13 / 9.63 = 1.35
1 berth  
Pool C Field size - Pool A berths - Pool B berths
64 - 43 - 1 = 20
20 berths

After all the automatic (Pool A) berths have been awarded by the conferences, the men's and women's committees will make their Pool B berth selections followed by their Pool C berth selections.  Teams are selected for Pool B and C at-large berths on a national basis, using regional selection criteria (see section below).  Beyond the selection criteria, note the following principles concerning at-large selections.  

  • To be considered during the at-large selection process (Pool B or C), a team must play at least 70 percent of its competition against Division III in-region opponents.
  • There will be no predetermined regional allocations for Pools B and C.
  • There will be no maximum or minimum number of berths from one region.
  • Institutions participating in conferences that meet the automatic-qualification requirements and are eligible to be selected to a championship via Pool A and/or Pool C, may not elect instead to be selected via Pool B as an independent institution.

Automatic Qualifying (AQ) Conferences

As per Section 2.3 of the Division III portion of the Pre-Championships Manual (pgs. 18-19), the following conferences have been granted automatic qualification (AQ) for the 2013 championship from Pool A.

Men's AQ Conferences (41)

Allegheny Mountain Collegiate Conference (AMCC)

American Southwest Conference (ASC)

Capital Athletic Conference (CAC)

Centennial Conference

City University of New York Athletic Conference (CUNYAC)

College Conference of Illinois and Wisconsin (CCIW)

Colonial States Athletic Conference (CSAC)

The Commonwealth Coast Conference(CCC)

Commonwealth Conference

Empire 8

Freedom Conference

Great Northeast Athletic Conference (GNAC)

 

Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference (HCAC)

Iowa Intercollegiate Athletic Conference (IIAC)

Landmark Conference

Liberty League

Little East Conference (LEC)

Massachusetts State College Athletic Conference (MASCAC)

Michigan Intercollegiate Athletic Association (MIAA)

Midwest Conference (MWC)

Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference (MIAC)

New England Collegiate Conference (NECC)

New England Small College Athletic Conference (NESCAC)

New England Women’s and Men’s Athletic Conference (NEWMAC)

New Jersey Athletic Conference (NJAC)

North Atlantic Conference (NAC)

North Coast Athletic Conference (NCAC)

North Eastern Athletic Conference (NEAC)

Northern Athletics Collegiate Conference (NACC)

Northwest Conference (NWC)

Ohio Athletic Conference (OAC)

Old Dominion Athletic Conference (ODAC)

President’s Athletic Conference (PAC)

Skyline Conference

St. Louis Intercollegiate Athletic Conference (SLIAC)

Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conference (SCIAC)

Southern Collegiate Athletic Conference (SCAC)

State University of New York Athletic Conference (SUNYAC)

University Athletic Association (UAA)

Upper Midwest Athletic Conference (UMAC)

USA South Athletic Conference

 

Women's AQ Conferences (43)

Allegheny Mountain Collegiate Conference (AMCC)

American Southwest Conference (ASC)

Capital Athletic Conference (CAC)

Centennial Conference

City University of New York Athletic Conference (CUNYAC)

College Conference of Illinois and Wisconsin (CCIW)

Colonial States Athletic Conference (CSAC)

The Commonwealth Coast Conference(CCC)

Commonwealth Conference

Empire 8

Freedom Conference

Great Northeast Athletic Conference (GNAC)

Great South Athletic Conference

Heartland Collegiate Athletic Conference (HCAC)

Iowa Intercollegiate Athletic Conference (IIAC)

Landmark Conference

Liberty League

Little East Conference (LEC)

Massachusetts State College Athletic Conference (MASCAC)

Michigan Intercollegiate Athletic Association (MIAA)

Midwest Conference (MWC)

Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference (MIAC)

New England Collegiate Conference (NECC)

New England Small College Athletic Conference (NESCAC)

New England Women’s and Men’s Athletic Conference (NEWMAC)

New Jersey Athletic Conference (NJAC)

North Atlantic Conference (NAC)

North Coast Athletic Conference (NCAC)

North Eastern Athletic Conference (NEAC)

Northern Athletics Collegiate Conference (NACC)

Northwest Conference (NWC)

Ohio Athletic Conference (OAC)

Old Dominion Athletic Conference (ODAC)

President’s Athletic Conference (PAC)

Skyline Conference

St. Louis Intercollegiate Athletic Conference (SLIAC)

Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conference (SCIAC)

Southern Collegiate Athletic Conference (SCAC)

State University of New York Athletic Conference (SUNYAC)

University Athletic Association (UAA)

Upper Midwest Athletic Conference (UMAC)

USA South Athletic Conference

Wisconsin Intercollegiate Athletics Conference

At-Large Selection Criteria

The at-large tournament selection criteria are found in Section 2.4 of the Pre-Championships Manual (pg. 20).  The criteria is divided between primary criteria which only consider matches against Division III opponents and secondary criteria that introduce matches against non-Division III opponents (NAIA, NCCAA, Division II, Division I), the later only being considered if the former does not enable a distinction to be made between schools.  (Note: this is a change from previous years when only games versus "in-region" opponents were consider as part of the primary criteria with secondary criteria considering out-of-region and non-Division III competition.)

Primary Criteria (not listed in priority order)

  • Win-loss percentage against Division III opponents
  • Division III head-to-head competition
  • Results versus common Division III opponents
  • Results versus ranked Division III teams
  • Division III Strength-of-schedule

Secondary Criteria (not listed in priority order)

  • Non-Division III win-loss percentage
  • Results versus common non-Division III opponents
  • Non-Division III Strength-of-schedule

Building the Tournament Brackets

Only after the tournament field is completely determined (automatic qualifiers identified and at-large Pools B and C teams selected) is the tournament bracket developed.  As per Section 2.5 of the Division III portion of the Pre-Championships Manual (pg. 21), the following guidelines should be followed in the pairing and grouping of teams.

Tournament Bracket-Building Guidelines

  • Teams will be grouped in clusters according to natural geographic proximity. Teams will then be paired according to geographic proximity. A team may be moved to numerically balance the bracket if geographic proximity is maintained.  Teams should be paired and eligible sites should be selected according to geographic proximity (within 500 miles).
  • Teams may be seeded on a regional basis using the regional selection criteria. However, geographic proximity takes precedence over seeding.
  • Teams from the same conference do not have to play one another in the first round as long as geographic proximity is maintained.
  • The highest-seeded team that meets all selection criteria (and after a review of the submitted host materials) will be selected as the host institution, provided geographic proximity is maintained.

The aim of these guidelines is to keep flights to a minimum, however, recent history demonstrates a strong attempt to create as many inter-regional match-ups as possible within these guidelines.  

Regional Rankings Foreshadow At-Large Berths

Regional rankings are done by the same national and regional committees which administrate the championship tournament and make the at-large selections. The rankings are done by applying the same criteria which is used for making the at-large selections, and are released following the fourth last, third last, and second last weeks prior to the tournament selections being made. Therefore, by design, these rankings are a direct foreshadowing of the at-large selections providing a certain level of transparency to the at-large selection process and avoiding major surprises when the at-large selections are announced.

As part of the at-large tournament selection process, the committees do final rankings that include the results from the final week prior to the tournament, usually the completion of conference tournaments. These rankings are not released, so one can only guess at how the final week's results may have prompted changes in the ranking of teams from the third of the scheduled rankings to selection day.

Strength-of-Schedule

The Strength-of-Schedule used by the Division III soccer committees is based on Opponents' Average Winning Percentage (OWP) and Opponents' Opponents' Average Winning Percentage (OOWP).  An explanation with an example of these calculations is found in Appendix D (pg. 44) of the Pre-Championships Manual.

Opponents' Average Winning Percentage (OWP):

The average of applicable opponents' winning percentages versus D-III competition excluding the results against the team in question.

Opponents' Opponents' Average Winning Percentage (OOWP):

The average of the OWP's of all applicable opponents.

Strength-of-Schedule (SOS):

The weighted OWP-OOWP, never specified but deduced to be
2/3 OWP + 1/3 OOWP

For men's soccer only, home and away multipliers are factored into the OWP and OOWP calculations shown above. A multiplier of 1.25 is applied for away games and a multiplier of 0.85 for home games.

Definition of In-Region Competition

Starting with the current 2013 season, the in-region/out-of-region distinction no longer matters for ranking and at-large selection criteria. However, teams are still required to play a minimum of 70 percent of their games against in-region Division III opponents to be eligible for at-large tournament selection. Given how broadly in-region competition is defined on page 19 of the Pre-Championship Manual to include much more than just other teams from your defined region (e.g. New England, East, Mid-Atlantic, etc.), this requirement isn't difficult to meet.

An opponent is considered in-region if any one of the following criteria is met:

  • within the same defined region
  • within a 200-mile driving radius
  • within the same membership geographical region defined as follows:

Region 1 - Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Rhode Island, Vermont

Region 2 - New York, Pennsylvania

Region 3 - Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, North Carolina, Ohio, Puerto Rico, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia

Region 4 - Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Washington, Wisconsin, Wyoming

  • within the same conference (in a conference scheduled match)
    (note: we add this final criteria because, though not specified in the manual, in practice all matches of multi-region conferences have always been counted as in-region)
Saturday, Dec. 7: All times Eastern
M:
Final - 2OT
Messiah 2, at Rutgers-Camden 1
Box Score Recap
W:
Final
William Smith 2, at Trinity (Texas) 0
Recap
Friday, Dec. 6: All times Eastern
M:
Final
at Messiah 4, Williams 0
Box Score Recap Photos Photos
M:
Final - OT
at Rutgers-Camden 3, Loras 2
Box Score
W:
Final
William Smith 1, at Capital 0
Box Score Recap Photos
W:
Final
at Trinity (Texas) 2, Middlebury 1
Box Score Photos
No contests today.
No contests today.