2017 NCAA Regional Rankings

The NCAA regional rankings are done by the same regional and national committees which will make the at-large selections for the men's and women's NCAA tournaments and the rankings are done by applying the same criteria which is used for making the at-large selections. The rankings are released following the fourth last, third last, and second last weeks prior to the tournament selections being made. Therefore, by design, these rankings are a direct foreshadowing of the at-large selections providing a certain level of transparency to the at-large selection process. It is for this reason that these rankings are so important and meaningful.

All information about the regional rankings is found in the Division III Soccer Pre-Championship Manual. Much of what follows highlights, summarizes, or quotes the manual.

Ranking Committees

The NCAA regional rankings are done by the eight-member NCAA Division III Men's and Women's Soccer Committees which are each composed of the chairs of their respective regional advisory committees. The Regional Advisory Committees assist the national committee in evaluating teams.  These are the same national and regional committees which will make the Pool B and Pool C at-large selections for the men's and women's NCAA tournaments. The members of these committees can be found on pages 9-13 of the Pre-Championship Manual.

Release Dates

As per the Pre-Championship Manual (pgs. 13, 18 and 19), the rankings will be released on the following dates which correspond to the last three Wednesdays prior to the tournament selections being made and the Monday that the at-large selections and tournament fields are announced:

• Wednesday, October 18

• Wednesday, October 25

• Wednesday, November 1

• Monday, November 6

Like the USC and D3Soccer.com rankings, they are based on results through the Sunday prior to their release.

Where to find the Rankings

The rankings are posted by the NCAA on their Division III men's and women's soccer webpages under "Rankings" where you must select the "Regional Rankings" option from the pull-down menu.  They are also conveniently available here on our site from the “Rankings” pull-down menu above or by clicking on the following links:

Men's Regional Rankings

Women's Regional Rankings

Size of the Rankings

The number of teams ranked differs from region to region and from men to women based on the number of eligible teams in each region. The top 16 percent of eligible teams (or a minimum of four) are ranked by the committees (that is an increase of 1% over previous seasons). As per the Pre-Championship Manual (pgs. 18-19), the number of teams to be ranked in 2017 is as follows:

Men's Rankings

New England Region—12

East Region—8

Mid-Atlantic Region—10

South Atlantic Region—8

Great Lakes Region—8

Central Region—6

North Region—7

West Region—6

 

Women's Rankings

New England Region—12

East Region—8

Mid-Atlantic Region—9

South Atlantic Region—9

Great Lakes Region—8

Central Region—6

North Region—8

West Region—6

The changes from last year, due to the increase to 16%, are that one more men's team will be ranked in the Mid-Atlantic, North and West regions, and one more women's team will be ranked in the East region. The regional alignments, school sponsorship, and eligibility by region can be found in Appendices B and C (“Men's Sponsorship” and "Women's Sponsorship, respectively) of the Pre-Championship Manual (pgs. 29-44).

Ranking Criteria

The rankings are done by applying the same criteria which is used for making the at-large tournament selections. The at-large selection criteria are found in Section 2.4 of the Pre-Championship Manual (pgs. 21-22). The criteria is divided between primary and secondary criteria, the latter only being considered if the former does not enable a distinction to be made between schools. The criteria underwent a significant change prior to the 2013 season when the in-region/out-of-region distinction was abandoned. Previously only games versus "in-region" opponents were consider as part of the primary criteria with secondary criteria considering out-of-region and non-Division III competition.  Now, primary criteria considers all Division III opponents while results versus non-Division III opponents (NAIA, NCCAA, Division II, Division I) are considered secondary criteria.

Primary Criteria (not listed in priority order)

  • Win-loss percentage against Division III opponents
  • Division III head-to-head competition
  • Results versus common Division III opponents
  • Results versus ranked Division III teams as established by the final ranking and the ranking preceeding the final ranking
  • Division III strength of schedule

Secondary Criteria (not listed in priority order)

  • Non-Division III win-lost percentage
  • Results versus common non-Division III opponents
  • Non-Division III strength-of-schedule
  • Division III non-conference strength-of-schedule

Regular season and conference postseason matches are considered.  See the sections that follow for an explanation/clarification of the results versus ranked teams and strength of schedule.

Results versus Ranked Teams

For the purposes of at-large selections, "ranked teams" are now (starting this season) those teams ranked in either the final rankings or the third weekly rankings. However, for the purposes of the weekly regional rankings, "ranked teams" only includes the teams ranked the previous week, not the previous two weeks. Obviously, for the first weekly regional rankings of the season, there is no previous ranking and thus there are no results versus ranked teams. Consequently, the regional data sheets (see section further down) for the first weekly rankings do not include teams' records verus ranked opponents, but starting with the second weekly rankings this criteria is in play and is among the criteria listed in the regional data sheets.

"Results versus ranked teams" criteria spelled out

For the . . . first weekly rankings:

second weekly rankings:

third weekly ranking:

final rankings:

at-large selections:
 

 

N/A (no previous rankings)

results versus teams ranked in the first weekly rankings

results versus teams ranked in the second weekly rankings

results versus teams ranked in the third weekly rankings

results versus teams ranked in either the third weekly
rankings or the final rankings

Strength of Schedule

The Strength of Schedule (SOS) used by the Division III soccer committees is based on Opponents' Average Winning Percentage (OWP) and Opponents' Opponents' Average Winning Percentage (OOWP). No home and away multipliers will be applied this season as was done from 2011 to 2016 for the men and last year for the women. An explanation with an example of these calculations is found in Appendix D (pg. 45) of the Pre-Championship Manual.

Opponents' Winning Percentage (OWP):

The winning percentage of opponents' cumulative
win-loss-tie record versus Division III competition
excluding the results against the team in question.

Opponents' Opponents' Winning Percentage (OOWP):

The winning percentage of the cumulative win-loss-tie
record of all opponents' opponents.

Strength of Schedule (SOS):

Composed of OWP and OOWP weighted as follows:
2/3 OWP + 1/3 OOWP

Note: The calculations changed starting last year.  Previously OWP was the average of each opponent's winning percentage and OOWP was the average of the OWP's of all opponents.

Regional Data Sheets

Along with the rankings, data sheets for each region are made available.  These data sheets, which include all teams in each region, provide some (but not all) of the data that was considered by the ranking committee.  The following data is listed: record and winning percentage against Division III opponents, results versus ranked Division III opponents, Division III SOS (all primary criteria), and non-Division III winning percentage (secondary criteria).  These sheets allow for a look at the numbers the committees had in front of them and therefore insight into why some teams are ranked and others not. The NCAA provides links to this data below the rankings. Direct links to the latest released data sheets are given below:

Men's Data Sheets

Central Region

East Region

Great Lakes Region

Mid-Atlantic Region

New England Region

North Region

South Atlantic Region

West Region

 

Women's Data Sheets

Central Region

East Region

Great Lakes Region

Mid-Atlantic Region

New England Region

North Region

South Atlantic Region

West Region

The data sheets can also be accessed by clicking the links on our regional rankings pages.

Published Final Rankings

As part of the at-large tournament selection process, the committees do final rankings that include the results from the final week prior to the tournament, usually the completion of conference tournaments. After five years in which they were not released, these final rankings were once again published last year following the announcement of the tournament fields, and that will continue this year after overwhelming positive feedback. The final rankings answer many questions about why certain teams were at-large selections and others not.

 

Sunday, Nov. 19: All times Eastern
M:
12:00 PM
Rutgers-Camden at Lebanon Valley
Video Live stats
M:
1:00 PM
Rochester at Messiah
Video Live stats
M:
1:00 PM
Brandeis at Tufts
Live stats
M:
2:00 PM
St. Thomas at North Park
W:
12:00 PM
New York University at Springfield
Video Live stats
W:
1:00 PM
Johns Hopkins at Williams
Video Live stats
W:
1:00 PM
Ohio Northern at Hardin-Simmons
Video Live stats
W:
1:00 PM
Messiah at TCNJ
Sunday, Nov. 19: All times Eastern
M:
1:00 PM
Rochester at Messiah
Video Live stats
M:
1:00 PM
Brandeis at Tufts
Live stats
M:
2:00 PM
St. Thomas at North Park
Sunday, Nov. 19: All times Eastern
W:
1:00 PM
Johns Hopkins at Williams
Video Live stats
W:
1:00 PM
Ohio Northern at Hardin-Simmons
Video Live stats
W:
1:00 PM
Messiah at TCNJ