September 1, 2011

Preseason perspectives

By Christan Shirk did a preseason Top 25 for the first time this year and it's hard to argue with choosing the defending and 8-time champion Messiah as preseason favorite.  Yes, they lost two All-American midfielders who combined for 16 assists and 31 goals, 15 which were game-winners, but replacing top players and returning to the Final Four is what Messiah has been doing for a decade now.  It will be interesting to see how quickly Messiah adjusts to life after Pezon and Nick Thompson, and that might depend on how effective target forward Josh Wood can be coming back from a whole season lost to injury and if freshman Jack Thompson, a playmaking midfielder, can hit the deck running at the collegiate level.  Those things could be key to whether they come out the gates looking like a No. 1 team or not.

But enough already about Messiah.  How does everyone else stack up going into the new season?  Who was ranked and why?  Who missed out and why? And did the voters get it right?  Now, to be sure, meaningful preseason rankings in Division III soccer is a highly difficult proposition.  It’s nearly impossible to make nationwide comparisons among 50 or so schools (the minimum that should be under consideration) never mind the 400-plus D-III schools.  First, many schools do note make available information regarding incoming players and non-graduation departures.  Second, the information available isn’t being compiled.  And third, there are just too many schools to realistically expect anyone to do a thorough study without being paid to do so, which is largely why item two isn’t happening.

But to the extent that information is available and time is taken to make comparisons, what should be considered?  Jim Matson, in his Daily Dose blog post A preseason Top 25, already listed most things to be studied: returning players, new players, variables from last season’s success or failures, and schedules.  With returning players we want to consider more than just the quantity of players and starters but also their production and contributions.  And conversely one needs to look at what a team lost—how critical were those players to the team’s success and can they be adequately replaced.  I would also add class distribution: is a team senior-laden possibly indicating experience, leadership, and composure?  Finally, given the difficulty of the task, I would suggest letting the conferences’ pre-season coaches’ polls inform the ranking.  Coaches will know much more about lost and returning players and the relative strength and potential of their conference rivals than someone from another conference or region.  You can’t ignore a solid conference’s favorite, and likewise caution should be taken before ranking a school that is only expected to be third or fourth best in their conference.

Working along those lines, there’s a few schools that I want to highlight because I think they have a very good shot to exceed the voters’ expectations.

Christopher Newport Captains If you wanted to make the case for another school as the pre-season #1, you can make a credible case for Christopher Newport.  In 2010 the Captains were receiving first place votes all season long, holding the #1 ranking for a few weeks in the middle part of the regular season.  Entering the tournament as the #2 ranked team, they bowed out to Johns Hopkins on a double-overtime goal in the second round and at 20-2-1 (4th best in D-III) were tabbed #11 when the dust had settled on the season.  The squad returns eight starters from last years' campaign, including five 1st team and two 2nd team all-conference selections, three NSCAA All-Region selections, and two All-Americans: forward Winston Mattheisen (10g, 8 a) and midfielder Brian Lybert (10g, 15a).  So, unlike Messiah, their top two attackers are back.  Overall, over 80% of their offensive production in 2010 returns (54 of 65 goals, 52 of 58 assists).  And not only are the top players back, but they are predominately seniors including a third-year starter in goal.  This team is tournament tested (Elite 8 in 2008 and 2009), beat Trinity in Texas last season and might be the strongest Captains team ever.

St. Lawrence University Saints A team that people should definitely keep an eye on as a potential title contender this year is St. Lawrence.  A little over a decade ago they were national champions and remained in the hunt for a second title through the mid-2000's.  But their star had fallen some from 2005 to 2009 to the point that few would have still named them as one of D-III's elite programs after they missed the NCAA tournament with a 8-6-1 record in 2009.  That damaged reputation was reflected by Top 25 voters largely ignoring them in 2010 until the final regular season rankings despite amassing a 16-2-2 record and 16-game unbeaten streak heading into the NCAA tournament.  Losing to Amherst 3-2 in the second round despite twice as many shots and shots on goal meant a 17-3-2 record was not good enough for a Top 25 ranking.  That snub possibly kept them from getting a closer look from some of the voters this pre-season which might suit Coach Durocher just fine to keep the team grounded.  But this team could be something special.  Ten starters are back from last year representing over 80% of their goals (36 of 44) and assists (37 of 42) in 2010.  Returning are their top five scorers including two NSCAA All-Americans: forward Brandon Gorman (7g, 4a) and midfielder Sam DeMello (8g, 9a).  The starting line-up figures to consist of five seniors, five juniors, and a sophomore who started every game his first season.  If they build on the success of last year, they could be among the best in 2011.

Wheaton College Thunder I think the voters' cautious take on Wheaton (Ill.) is sensible, but I'd guess few will be surprised if they do much better than #24.  Last year was one of growing pains for a squad featuring 24 freshmen and sophomores and Wheaton's typical killer non-conference schedule (three teams finished ranked in the top 6, two more Top 25, and two more receiving votes) was too much for the youngsters who dropped six and tied three in posting a very uncharacteristic 2-6-3 mark before entering conference play.  That experience and the generally easier competition resulted in the Thunder winning their next nine in a row before losing 3-2 in overtime in the conference final to a North Park side the had beaten 3-1 a month earlier.  It meant the team missed out on the NCAA's for the first time in 17 seasons.  As painful as that was for the Wheaton faithful, the experience gained from the tough schedule and the sting of falling short of the program's traditional success should propel this years' squad to unqualified success.  Those freshmen and sophomores are now sophomores and juniors, and it should be remembered that Wheaton was competitive in every loss or tie last year, only once losing by more than 1 goal and going to overtime five times.  The non-conference schedule is a little more reasonable this time around, though still among the toughest, but it's reasonable to expect some of last year's ties to become wins and some of the losses to become ties or wins this season.  How many will determine if this time is good or great.

New York University Violets After New York University's surprising emergence and run to the Final Four in 2006 the team suffered through two losing seasons in 2008 and 2009.  That made them a surprise success again in 2010 when they captured the UAA title (their first) before a heart-breaking 3-2 first round tournament loss to Brockport State after leading 2-0 a half hour in.  They finished about five spots outside the Top 25 and found themselves similarly rated in the current pre-season poll.  They sit beneath fellow UAA rivals Emory (#10), Washington (#17), and even Carnegie Mellon (RV) who just edged them.  But the UAA coaches, who it should be safe to assume have a better knowledge of how their teams stack up against each other than other observers from all across the country, selected NYU as its clear preseason favorite with five of eight first place votes. Emory followed in second without a single first place vote, then Rochester and Washington in third and fourth with one and two first place votes respectively.  It's not a case of thinking the voters got it wrong with Emory and Washington, but rather that NYU might deserve to be up there with them. All three of those schools bring back seven starters and all three have the bulk of their offensive output returning.  All three lost two All-UAA defenders or goalkeepers. With similar losses and retention, the defending champions who didn't allow any goals in conference play a year ago probably merit a little more respect from outside their conference.

In closing, a few schools that are probably off the radar that I think might prove to be Top 25 teams are Ohio Northern, Hamilton, Nazareth, Redlands, and Claremont-Mudd-Scripps.

Comments or feedback for the author?  Email Christan Shirk.

Want to discuss this article with other fans?  Opine here.


Christan Shirk


Christan Shirk is a Messiah College graduate (1993, Civil Engineering) and has been a keen and passionate observer of D-III soccer for over a decade and a half. Never more than a rec-league player himself, Chris brings an analytical approach and nationwide perspective to He loves D-III soccer history, statistical number-crunching, and off-the-radar action, all of which he gladly shares with his readers when he's able to find time to write. [see full bio]

Questions or comments?

»  E-mail Christan Shirk
Nov 8: 2018 Tournament Field Factoids
Nov 4: Men's at-large berth analysis and predictions
Oct 27: AQ's, Pool B and Pool C? What does it all mean?
Oct 13: Coming Wednesday: the rankings that matter
Sep 6: Letting go . . . of unfinished business
Sep 3: What's new in 2018
Nov 10: 2017 Tournament Field Factoids
Nov 5: Men's at-large berth analysis and predictions
Nov 3: AQ's, Pool B and Pool C? What does it all mean?
Oct 15: Coming Wednesday: the rankings that matter
Nov 12: 2016 Tournament Field Factoids
Nov 6: Men's at-large berth analysis and predictions
Oct 30: AQ's, Pool B and Pool C? What does it all mean?
Oct 15: Coming Wednesday: the rankings that matter
Sep 10: Week 1 Flybys
Sep 1: What's new in 2016? - Part 2: Rules Changes
Aug 25: What's new in 2016? - Part 1
Nov 11: 2015 Tournament Field Factoids
Nov 8: Men's at-large berth analysis and predictions
Nov 5: AQ's, Pool B and Pool C? What does it all mean?
Oct 15: The rankings that matter are coming next week
Oct 9: 2015 Midseason Flyovers
Oct 4: Year Nine: State of the Website
Sep 28: Kelsey Graham is named a finalist for NCAA Woman of the Year
Sep 4: D-III soccer represented among Top 30 honorees for NCAA Woman of the Year
Sep 1: Kyle Goodwin, Natalie Caney net season's first goals
Aug 20: What's new for 2015 season?
Jul 23: Division III soccer players get conference nod for NCAA Woman of the Year
Jul 14: Lillie Toaspern pursues pro career with the Chicago Red Stars
Jun 19: Thirty-one Division III soccer players nominated for NCAA Woman of the Year
Apr 30: Alumni game scheduled for Saturday in effort to save Titan soccer
Apr 22: Curtains on UW-Oshkosh men’s soccer?
Nov 20: Getting to know the 2014 men's Sweet 16
Nov 9: Men's at-large berth analysis and predictions
Nov 8: AQ's, Pool B and Pool C? What does it all mean?
Oct 15: The rankings that count are coming next week
Aug 27: What's new in 2014? - Part 2: Rules Changes
Aug 22: What's new in 2014? - Part 1
Nov 22: Getting to know the 2013 men's Sweet 16
Nov 10: Men's at-large berth analysis and predictions
Nov 7: AQ's, Pool B and Pool C? What does it all mean?
Nov 6: The most important rankings of the year
Oct 23: New criteria debuts in today's NCAA Regional Rankings
Sep 28: Two streaks end while another one continues
Sep 15: Week 3 Flybys, weekend edition
Sep 15: Week 3 Flybys, weekend edition
Aug 29: What's new in 2013?
Nov 14: Welcome to the Sweet 16, Part 2: the Men
Nov 13: Welcome to the Sweet 16, Part 1: the Women
Nov 4: At-large berth analysis and predictions
Nov 3: AQ's, Pool B and Pool C? What does it all mean?
Oct 1: Dear Men's Top 25 Voters
Sep 22: Week 4 Flybys, weekend edition
Sep 21: Week 4 Flybys, midweek edition
Sep 17: Week 3 Flybys
Sep 4: Labor Day Weekend Flybys
Sep 3: New rules, new conference, name changes
Aug 31: 2012 Preseason Flybys (INCOMPLETE)
Nov 14: Hellooooo Neumann!
Nov 13: A Super Saturday to like and dislike
Nov 6: At-large berth analysis and predictions
Nov 4: So what's this talk about AQ's, Pool B and Pool C?
Oct 24: Week 8 Flyby Distractions
Oct 19: NCAA Regional Rankings (aka 'The Rankings that Matter')
Oct 17: Week 7 Flybys, Conference Edition
Oct 14: Midseason stars and surprises
Oct 8: Week 6 Flybys, weekend edition
Oct 6: Week 6 Flybys, midweek edition
Oct 1: Week 5 Flybys, weekend edition
Sep 29: Week 5 Flybys, midweek edition
Sep 26: Did you know?
Sep 19: Who's top dog after 3 weeks?
Sep 10: Friday Notes, Weekend Questions
Sep 2: Off with a bang!
Sep 1: Preseason perspectives
Sep 1: After 17 years, trailblazer calls it a day